difference between Realistic Cinema & commercial cinema?

REALISTIC V/S commercial

Realistic cinema, often known as realism cinema, is a type of film that is based on true events in society. In the film, realism is neither a genre nor a movement, and it lacks any fixed formal rules or subject matter. But does this indicate that realism is just a trick of the eye? It produces the illusion of reality, or a “slice of life,” without altering or manipulating everyday life.

In this genre, the director aims to portray the foundation of existence as accurately as possible. Because it will assist the user in accepting that the film or films depict reality.

Content is more important than expressionism or style in any film. You may lose plots that lack a clear beginning, middle, and end, or resolution; the conflict may grow gradually.

The movie may be episodic, but continuity isn’t a priority. Documentary realism, poetic realism, and studio realism are subcategories of realistic techniques proposed by some cinema theorists.


Realistic has defined two unique kinds of filmmaking and two approaches to the cinematographic picture in the history of Indian cinema. In the first case, it refers to a film’s possibility of being credible in terms of its characters and events. Classic Hollywood cinema best exemplifies this reality. The second example of cinematic realism is that it begins with the camera’s mechanical representation of reality and ends up questioning Hollywood filmmaking conventions.

Art V/S Commercial

The precise, realistic, and detailed representation of the visual appearance of things and scenes in art is known as realism. It is a mirror of our surroundings. Some artists and philosophers feel that there is no such thing as objective “reality.” But it’s merely for the sake of focus. Some of the examples of realistic films are Satya, Pathar Panchali, Bicycle Thief, Neecha Nagar, Nagarik, and many more.